Maybe someone knows the answer...
Jun. 29th, 2003 04:48 pmI've been thinking about this since the first book, and with every beginning and ending since of the four books in the series that I've read.
Uncle Vernon and Aunt Petunia seem to hate Harry Potter with every fiber of their being, with the intense, burning hatred of a thousand fiery suns.
Why are they so hell-bent on keeping him around?
I don't get this. They don't want him to come home for holidays during the school year, but they refuse to let him visit Ron over the summer. Weh? Shouldn't they be *glad* to get rid of him? If he's gone over the summer as well, they'd practically never have to see him at all.
Enlighten me, o great thinkers of Pottermania.
Uncle Vernon and Aunt Petunia seem to hate Harry Potter with every fiber of their being, with the intense, burning hatred of a thousand fiery suns.
Why are they so hell-bent on keeping him around?
I don't get this. They don't want him to come home for holidays during the school year, but they refuse to let him visit Ron over the summer. Weh? Shouldn't they be *glad* to get rid of him? If he's gone over the summer as well, they'd practically never have to see him at all.
Enlighten me, o great thinkers of Pottermania.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-29 03:41 pm (UTC)"But how to get at Harry Potter? For he has been better protected than I think even he knows, protected in ways devised by Dumbledore long agoe, when it fell to him to arrange the boy's future. Dumbledore invoked an ancient magic, to ensure the boy's protection as long as he is in his relation's care. Not even I can touch him there..."
It's on page 657 (I have the hardcover copy, I don't know if you have it or if the page numbers are different for paperback). :)
Yay, now I can rest.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-29 03:58 pm (UTC)Yay, I'm not crazy! And no wonder it sounded familiar, I just read it! I've got the hardcover, and I found it on that page. Thanks.
And again, that settles why Dumbledore keeps sending Harry back, though not necessarily why the Dursleys don't keep sending him away. ;-)
Do we know if Aunt Petunia is a Squib? She mentions in the first book that her parents are proud to have a witch in the family. Lily was younger, right? So if Petunia's parents were wizarding folk, they'd have been pleased that the second child showed magical leanings...or am I reaching?
And was it fanfic, or it is mentioned in the books that Aunt Petunia had to nurse her sickly/injured mother??? My brain's in a tizzy.
Re:
Date: 2003-06-29 04:04 pm (UTC)And I think it was fanfic that you read that about Petunia and Lily's mother because I don't read fanfic at all and that's not ringing a bell. That's why I don't read HP fanfic, actually. It's too easy to get confused. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-29 04:16 pm (UTC)It is, isn't it? Maybe I'll lay off the HP fic for a while. At least until I've finished OotP.
I was thinking about the Squib thing when I read Goblet of Fire. It would explain, if her parents were wizards too, that Petunia's probably just psychotically, maniacally jealous that her sister was a witch and she isn't.
Then again, until I've read each of the books at lest one more time, I'm probably talking out of my asshat. ;-)
Re:
Date: 2003-06-29 04:21 pm (UTC)Damn it, I hate being a Muggle! How come I didn't get an Owl when I was 11? :(
no subject
Date: 2003-06-29 04:34 pm (UTC)That's why I was wondering. I assumed they were Muggles too, when I first read the book, but now I wonder. Don't know why it took me four books to wonder, but it did. ;-)
If they'd been wizards though, she probably wouldn't have mentioned it, because then *she'd* be the freak in the family, not Lily, not Harry.
If Petunia came from wizard stock, would Uncle Vernon have married her? It's one thing for your wife's sister to be a black sheep, and yet another for your wife to have been born of magical parents.
That'd actually be a neat little psychological twist.
Re:
Date: 2003-06-29 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-29 04:44 pm (UTC)Good Lord, woman, you're a walking HP encyclopedia! I'm impressed. :-)
Re:
Date: 2003-06-29 04:47 pm (UTC)